Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Curry results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 826.639 faulty-reasoning hits from 331 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,973 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Curry is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Sam Curry
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠16%Sam Curry (selected)12%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 331
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.5% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos331 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.6%19.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos