Author summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Greenberg results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 2,243 hits . Analysis detected 10,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,895 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,719 of 6,602 authors). This Andy Greenberg is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Andy Greenberg
Author details
Total words: 13,895
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.1% 16.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst