Author summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video2,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dhruv Mehrotra results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 795 hits. Analysis detected 5,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (3,995 of 6,628 authors). This Dhruv Mehrotra is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Dhruv Mehrotra
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠40%Dhruv Mehrotra (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,648
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos