Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salehi results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Authority, with Genetic Fallacy as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 197 faulty-reasoning hits from 128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,278 of 28,364 speakers). This Salehi is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Salehi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 128
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
22.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos128 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic FallacySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos