Speaker summary
⁠71%4 analyzed articles/videos47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saab results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 78.6% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 54.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,753 of 28,364 speakers). This Saab is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
54.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 78.6%78.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 78.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos