Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video292.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rolf Warming results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 71.063 hits. Analysis detected 316.063 faulty-reasoning hits from 292.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (25,873 of 28,364 speakers). This Rolf Warming is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Rolf Warming
Speaker details
Total words: 292.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.8% percentile
8.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos292.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 6.2%6.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos