Author summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video1,016 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabel Gil results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (5,279 of 6,628 authors). This Isabel Gil is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Isabel Gil
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠21%Isabel Gil (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,048
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510020.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.3%7.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.2%2.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos