Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roger Stone results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Confirmation Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (12,473 of 37,954 speakers). This Roger Stone is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Roger Stone
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠68%Roger Stone (selected)50%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510067.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos