Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video60.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert DeNiro results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Straw Man, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 63.6% saturation with 42.603 hits. Analysis detected 196.777 faulty-reasoning hits from 60.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,056 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert DeNiro is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Robert DeNiro
Speaker details
Total words: 60.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
39.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos60.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 63.6%63.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 55.1%55.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 53.9%53.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.8%22.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 63.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos