Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hugo Gurdon results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 3,321 hits. Analysis detected 12,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,525 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Hugo Gurdon is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hugo Gurdon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Hugo Gurdon (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 9,525
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 34.9%34.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 21.9%21.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 21.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos