Speaker summary
⁠59%5 analyzed articles/videos431.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Saka results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 41.7% saturation with 257.678 hits. Analysis detected 1,467.283 faulty-reasoning hits from 431.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (23,948 of 25,962 speakers). This Rob Saka is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.8% percentile
8.3% BS Score5 analyzed videos431.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos