Speaker summary
29% 6 analyzed articles/videos 873.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Manfred results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 151 hits . Analysis detected 939 faulty-reasoning hits from 873.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,784 of 28,364 speakers). This Rob Manfred is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group. Rob Manfred
Speaker details
Total words: 873.667
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score6 analyzed videos873.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst