Speaker summary
⁠89%2 analyzed articles/videos52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Gronkowski results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 170 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 65.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,140 of 26,780 speakers). This Rob Gronkowski is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Rob Gronkowski
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
65.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 63.5%63.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 63.5%63.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 63.5%63.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.5%36.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 63.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 63.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 63.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos