Speaker summary
39% 7 analyzed articles/videos 618.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rick Hasen results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 117 hits . Analysis detected 836.487 faulty-reasoning hits from 618.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,368 of 28,364 speakers). This Rick Hasen is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group. Rick Hasen
Speaker details
Total words: 618.667
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.0% percentile 7.8% BS Score7 analyzed videos618.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 23.3% 23.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst