Speaker summary
⁠89%2 analyzed articles/videos98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Tice results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Red Herring, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 208 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,746 of 28,364 speakers). This Richard Tice is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Richard Tice
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 98
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.0% percentile
30.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos98 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.2%12.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos