Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Walker results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 744 hits . Analysis detected 4,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,101 of 6,628 authors). This Peter Walker is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Peter Walker
Author details
Total words: 3,520
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.3% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.1% 21.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst