Speaker summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Gere results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 43.2% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 663.906 faulty-reasoning hits from 385 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,671 of 28,364 speakers). This Richard Gere is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Richard Gere
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 385
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.5% percentile
9.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos385 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 5.9%5.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos