Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ravi Bellamkonda results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 160.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,373 of 28,364 speakers). This Ravi Bellamkonda is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Ravi Bellamkonda
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.9% percentile
34.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 55.4%55.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos