Speaker summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos172.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rasmus Jorgensen results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 313 faulty-reasoning hits from 172.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (23,258 of 26,730 speakers). This Rasmus Jorgensen is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Rasmus Jorgensen
Speaker details
Total words: 172.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
10.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos172.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.9%18.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos