Speaker summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rashi Kesarwani results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 411 faulty-reasoning hits from 368 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,615 of 28,364 speakers). This Rashi Kesarwani is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Rashi Kesarwani
Speaker details
Total words: 368
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
12.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos368 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.6%16.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos