Author summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Swan results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 279 hits . Analysis detected 3,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,098 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,295 of 6,534 authors). This Rachel Swan is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Rachel Swan
Author details
Total words: 4,098
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst