Speaker summary
⁠34%3 analyzed articles/videos56.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prison Policy Initiative results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 45 faulty-reasoning hits from 56.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (13,616 of 37,380 speakers). This Prison Policy Initiative is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Prison Policy Initiative
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠64%Prison Policy Initiative (selected)46%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 56.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
45.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos56.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 45.5%45.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos