Speaker summary
74% 5 analyzed articles/videos 373.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pope Leo results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 219.442 hits . Analysis detected 1,304.857 faulty-reasoning hits from 373.667 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of 16% (23,871 of 28,364 speakers). This Pope Leo is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group. Pope Leo
Speaker details
Total words: 373.667
Content count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.8% percentile 12.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos373.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 46.0% 46.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 18.8% 18.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 17.5% 17.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 22.1% 22.1% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 19.4% 19.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst