Speaker summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos600.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phillip Cejudo results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Anecdotal, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.4% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 929.639 faulty-reasoning hits from 600.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (25,112 of 26,891 speakers). This Phillip Cejudo is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Phillip Cejudo
Speaker details
Total words: 600.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
7.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos600.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.4%5.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.4%32.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos