Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philip Rieff results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Primacy Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,313 of 27,666 speakers). This Philip Rieff is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Philip Rieff
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510088.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos