Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These PHI results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,163 of 26,155 speakers). This PHI is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
PHI
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510087.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos