Speaker summary
⁠56%5 analyzed articles/videos329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Aguilar results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Red Herring, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 66.954 hits. Analysis detected 524.124 faulty-reasoning hits from 329 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,422 of 28,364 speakers). This Pete Aguilar is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Pete Aguilar
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
7.8% BS Score5 analyzed videos329 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Red Herring: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Middle Ground: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos