70%2 analyzed articles/videos150.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Penn Wharton Budget Model results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 89.2% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 568.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 150.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (15,445 of 28,364 speakers).This Penn Wharton Budget Model is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.