Speaker summary
⁠58%3 analyzed articles/videos60.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Revere results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 57% saturation with 38.174 hits. Analysis detected 128.174 faulty-reasoning hits from 60.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,088 of 28,364 speakers). This Paul Revere is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Paul Revere
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 60.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
32.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos60.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 57.0%57.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 30.2%30.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.2%30.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.2%30.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 57.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos