Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul* results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 59.1% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 398 faulty-reasoning hits from 171 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,700 of 28,364 speakers). This Paul* is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Paul*
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 171
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
21.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos171 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 59.1%59.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 40.9%40.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.1%25.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.8%22.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 59.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 40.9%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos