Speaker summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Infurna results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 46 hits . Analysis detected 336.683 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,608 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrick Infurna is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Patrick Infurna
Speaker details
Total words: 129
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.3% percentile 14.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos129 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 30.0% 30.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 25.7% 25.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 22.0% 22.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 23.2% 23.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 23.0% 23.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% No True Scotsman: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst