Speaker summary
⁠81%3 analyzed articles/videos97.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrice Johnson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Genetic Fallacy, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 36% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,904 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrice Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Patrice Johnson
Speaker details
Total words: 97.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
36.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos97.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.1%20.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 20.1%20.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos