Author summary
32% 1 analyzed article/video 641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Banco Reuters results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Optimism Bias , and Genetic Fallacy , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 127 hits . Analysis detected 873 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,923 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,400 of 6,235 authors). This Erin Banco Reuters is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Erin Banco Reuters
Author details
Total words: 1,923
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst