Author summary
32%1 analyzed article/video641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Banco Reuters results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Optimism Bias, and Genetic Fallacy, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 873 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,923 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,400 of 6,235 authors). This Erin Banco Reuters is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Erin Banco Reuters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
30%Erin Banco Reuters (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,923
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510029.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.2%3.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos