Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video97.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paris White results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 186.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (20,299 of 37,442 speakers). This Paris White is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Paris White
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠46%Paris White (selected)28%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 97.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
27.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos97.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.0%37.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.5%18.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos