Speaker summary
⁠27%3 analyzed articles/videos100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oscar Wilde results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 81 faulty-reasoning hits from 100 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (21,605 of 27,710 speakers). This Oscar Wilde is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Oscar Wilde
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 100
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
14.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos100 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos