Author summary
13%1 analyzed article/video3,486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Silverman Ascher results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 598 hits. Analysis detected 4,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,458 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (6,453 of 6,584 authors). This Rob Silverman Ascher is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Rob Silverman Ascher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
2%Rob Silverman Ascher (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,458
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751002.0% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos