Speaker summary
42%84 analyzed articles/videos3,852.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OpenAI results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 452.425 hits. Analysis detected 4,646.482 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,852.333 analyzed words across 84 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,301 of 28,364 speakers). This OpenAI is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score84 analyzed videos3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.7%8.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

OpenAI Hacking Fiasco Exposes a “Deeply Insufficient” System to Protect the Public31%
Mother Jones51%By Alex Nguyen35%7/24/2026, 6:55:31 PM
ChatGPT Health Is Rolling Out to Everyone, but I Don’t Trust It36%
Lifehacker63%By Beth Skwarecki29%7/24/2026, 6:30:00 PM
OpenAI's HuggingFace breach heralds an unprecedented age of AI cyber warfare — contemporary LLMs have caused massive upheaval in cybersecurity, and it's only going to get worse94%
Tom's Hardware50%By Bruno Ferreira85%7/24/2026, 4:12:08 PM
US lawmakers propose AI ‘kill switch’ bill88%
Semafor84%By Tom Chivers87%7/24/2026, 1:52:05 PM
Is ChatGPT down for you? Here's what's going on46%
Android Authority64%By Ryan McNeal19%7/23/2026, 8:37:51 PM
How OpenAI’s Models Escaped Their Sandbox and Slipped Past California's AI Law20%
KQED61%By Rachael Myrow42%7/23/2026, 4:47:00 PM
OpenAI's agent breached Hugging Face before an AI defender caught it: What users should do next64%
ZDNET58%By Charlie Osborne45%7/23/2026, 2:29:00 PM
How To Run AI Agents Safely After One Hacked Hugging Face58%
Forbes46%By Jodie Cook77%7/23/2026, 1:00:03 PM
🚧 Rethinking Monroe Drive44%
Rough Draft Atlanta39%By Rough Draft Staff55%7/23/2026, 12:30:00 PM
OpenAI says rogue AI models broke free from human control. Some see it as a ‘warning shot’60%
San Diego Union-Tribune86%By Associated Press60%7/23/2026, 11:49:27 AM