Speaker summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Wales results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39.4% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 532.307 faulty-reasoning hits from 201 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,506 of 28,364 speakers). This Olivia Wales is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Olivia Wales
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 201
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
21.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos201 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.4%39.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos