Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Rodrigo results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 62.3% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 179.83 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,744 of 28,364 speakers). This Olivia Rodrigo is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Olivia Rodrigo
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
40.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 79.7%79.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 62.3%62.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.8%35.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 79.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 9.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos