Speaker summary
⁠47%3 analyzed articles/videos150.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oklahoma Corporation Commission results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 329 faulty-reasoning hits from 150.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,211 of 28,364 speakers). This Oklahoma Corporation Commission is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Oklahoma Corporation Commission
Speaker details
Total words: 150.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.7% percentile
18.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos150.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 56.5%56.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos