Speaker summary
42% 5 analyzed articles/videos 73 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nvidia results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and Bandwagon , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 33 hits . Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 73 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,118 of 27,738 speakers). This Nvidia is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group. Nvidia
Speaker details
Total words: 73
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.7% percentile 12.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos73 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 24.4% 24.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst