Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NRDC Action Fund results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 75.7% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 65 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,194 of 28,364 speakers). This NRDC Action Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
NRDC Action Fund
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
58.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 75.7%75.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 75.7%75.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 24.3%24.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 75.7%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 75.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos