Speaker summary
⁠32%3 analyzed articles/videos596.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Niraj Dangoria results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 761 faulty-reasoning hits from 596.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (33,078 of 35,542 speakers). This Niraj Dangoria is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Niraj Dangoria
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠7%Niraj Dangoria (selected)8%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 596.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
7.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos596.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 3.7%3.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Red Herring: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos