Speaker summary
58%3 analyzed articles/videos319.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nikolai Vitti results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 608.582 faulty-reasoning hits from 319.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,991 of 37,767 speakers). This Nikolai Vitti is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
Nikolai Vitti
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
10%Nikolai Vitti (selected)9%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 319.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.0% percentile
8.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos319.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.6%17.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate