Speaker summary
47% 3 analyzed articles/videos 243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nickolay Mladenov results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 95 hits . Analysis detected 452.368 faulty-reasoning hits from 243 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of 16% (23,923 of 28,364 speakers). This Nickolay Mladenov is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Nickolay Mladenov
Speaker details
Total words: 243
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.7% percentile 11.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos243 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 19.3% 19.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 17.4% 17.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 21.3% 21.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 2.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst