Speaker summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Shirley results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 147 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 63.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,332 of 27,017 speakers). This Nick Shirley is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Nick Shirley
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.6% percentile
63.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 46.5%46.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos