Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sara Libby results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 3,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,561 authors). This Sara Libby is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sara Libby
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Sara Libby (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.6%14.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.7%11.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos