Speaker summary
77%3 analyzed articles/videos137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Kent results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 69% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 576.183 faulty-reasoning hits from 137 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.3% and a BS Rank of 51% (14,109 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicholas Kent is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Nicholas Kent
Speaker details
Total words: 137
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
32.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos137 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 55.4%55.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 69.0%69.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.9%18.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate