BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 687 hits. Analysis detected 2,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,334 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (8,956 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the article peer group.

President Trump gloated Wednesday about lifting restrictions on 90 acres of protected land so that he could help along the recently finished construction of the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library in North Dakota. 
“During my first term it was a privilege to sign the bill that helped get this incredible project underway, and transferring 90 acres,” Trump said at the ceremony for the library’s opening Wednesday. 
“We took it right out of the federal government. 
We ripped it away from the federal government, they don’t know it’s missing. 
They still haven’t figured out what the hell happened.” 
The Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library Foundation bought 90.3 acres of protected land from the U.S. 
Forest Service in 2021, after a bill supported by President Trump triggered the sale in December 2020. 
Aside from the sale, Trump has significantly rolled back environmental protections that Roosevelt championed during his tenure, weakening the Endangered Species Act and exposing 86 million previously protected acres to drilling and development. 
President Trump has lost three legal cases in 24 hours. 
First the Supreme Court struck down his executive order banning birthright citizenship on Tuesday morning because it violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. 
Then, hours later, a federal judge dismissed the White House’s effort to acquire New Hampshire’s voter information. 
After that, two federal judges shut down the president’s restrictions on a student loan forgiveness program. 
On New Hampshire, U.S. 
District Judge Joseph LaPlante found the administration’s request to get the state’s voter registration list infringed the Civil Rights Act’s provisions on federal election records. 
LaPlante also ruled that the Justice Department couldn’t find any real violations of the Help America Vote Act of 2002, which created standards for states’ voter registration lists and voting systems, to merit access to the voter rolls. 
It’s the tenth time the DOJ has lost a case in which it sought voter information from a state government. 
Judges have ruled against the Trump administration in Arizona, California, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin, and dismissed a Georgia effort because it was filed in the wrong city. 
On student loans, federal judges appointed by President Biden in Washington, D.C., and Massachusetts blocked Trump’s attempt to reshape the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, which helps those who work for the government or nonprofit organizations. 
Trump attempted to prevent public service workers from getting student debt relief if their work had a “substantial illegal purpose” in the eyes of the administration. 
A coalition of nonprofit organizations joined 20 states to file a lawsuit against the rule, claiming that Trump’s Department of Education could target organizations that go against the president’s personal views, such as those dedicated to immigrant rights and transgender health care. 
“The Department cannot create new criminal prohibitions through rulemaking,” U.S. 
District Judge Myoung Joun ruled in Massachusetts, stating that the department didn’t have legal authority and could be violating the Constitution’s First Amendment. 
“Indeed, the record further demonstrates ‌that the ⁠Final Rule has already chilled protected speech.” 
In Washington, U.S. 
District Judge Amir Ali struck down the rule in a case brought by four nonprofits that work for immigrant rights. 
The Trump administration’s response to the student loan rulings seemed to prove the judges’ point. 
“The Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program is intended to support Americans who serve the public good, not to subsidize organizations that engage in terrorism, facilitate illegal immigration, or support the mutilation of children,” Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent complained in a statement. 
In all, these rulings show Trump’s contempt for the Constitution and that federal courts seem to be the only branch of government willing to prevent the administration from flouting it, as Republicans in Congress are unwilling to stand up to the president. 
Trump will have to come to terms that some of his favorite policies aren’t backed up by U.S. law. 
Donald Trump is still trying to stiff E. 
Jean Carroll, according to the columnist’s attorney. 
Roberta Kaplan, Carroll’s lawyer, wrote in a court filing Tuesday that Trump’s legal representative had called her the day prior asking for another delay to the $5 million sum Trump owes the writer. 
Later Monday, Kaplan said she informed Trump’s team that “Carroll does not consent,” and asked whether Trump would comply with the immediate disbursement of funds. 
Carroll has a long and unfortunate history with the president. 
Trump was found liable by a jury in May 2023 for having sexually assaulted Carroll in the mid-1990s, for which she was awarded $5 million in damages. 
He subsequently lost his defamation case against her the following January, when a judge ruled that Trump had continued to defame the advice columnist by denying the assault on the basis that she wasn’t his “type,” and by accusing her of making up the allegations against him for the benefit of her book. 
A jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million in that case. 
But Carroll hasn’t yet seen a dime from either case. 
In May, a federal appeals court allowed Trump to continue staving off his payments until the Supreme Court decided whether or not to pick up the case. 
The court made their decision Monday, rejecting Trump’s challenge and allowing the verdict to stand. 
In a separate filing Tuesday, Kaplan asked a judge to implement an expedited payment schedule for the sum that Trump owes Carroll. 
She referred to a June 2023 filing in which both parties agreed that Carroll could collect if the Supreme Court refused to hear the case. 
Kaplan added that, by this point, the $5 million sum had accrued an additional $779,783 in interest, raising Trump’s initial debt to nearly $5.8 million. 
Nonetheless, Trump has continued to make a target out of Carroll. 
In May, the Justice Department opened a criminal investigation into the writer, probing whether Carroll committed perjury in her previous cases against Trump. 
White House staff are reportedly concerned that Donald Trump’s Fourth of July rally is a recipe for disaster—one that will send the president into yet another meltdown. 
The remarkably low turnout for Trump’s Great American State Fair has sparked serious worries that the president’s massive rally planned for Saturday will also be a dud, multiple sources told CNN Wednesday. 
The rally is scheduled to take place outside on the National Mall, as temperatures in Washington are forecast to reach a stifling 100 degrees. 
One official familiar with the event told CNN that there would likely be large groups of people who reserved tickets for Trump’s address but don’t end up attending. 
Empty seats means that viewers are likely in for another presidential temper tantrum—a sorry sight given it will be the country’s 250th anniversary. 
The rally will be punctuated by a massive fireworks display, currently scheduled to begin at 11 p.m. 
Unlike in past years, attendees will not be able to bring coolers to help beat the heat. 
“I do not understand why we are doing this so late,” one White House official told CNN, adding there were still ongoing efforts to fix the timing. 
“I’m really not sure who thought this was a good idea.” 
So far, Trump’s Great American State Fair has been supremely underwhelming and beset by technical difficulties, lame programming, and disappointing weather delays. 
Trump has raged in the face of bad reviews and lied about the visibly low attendance. 
Internally, those in Trump’s orbit have begun pointing fingers about the president’s own Fyre Festival (except people actually went to the Fyre Festival). 
“The mistake here was not driving attendance,” one person close to the White House told CNN. 
“It was an ‘if you build it, they will come’ mentality that failed.” 
The MAGA-verse has begun to attack pregnant women in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 5–4 ruling to uphold the birthright citizenship clause of the Constitution, which holds that nearly anyone born on U.S. soil is an American citizen, regardless of where their parents are from. 
Their new suggestion: Ban all pregnant foreigners from entering the country. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.3%Malcolm Ferguson: 5.6%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias8.3%This article: 3.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias3.1%This article: 12.2%Malcolm Ferguson: 3.3%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic12.2%This article: 0.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.8%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Malcolm Ferguson: 11.7%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias5.8%This article: 51.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 17.7%newrepublic.com: 13.3%Negativity Bias51.5%This article: 2.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias2.5%This article: 1.3%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error1.3%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.2%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias11.2%This article: 0.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.6%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias10.5%This article: 1.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 5.2%newrepublic.com: 3.8%Ad Hominem2.6%This article: 3.2%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man3.2%This article: 4.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 3.1%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority4.4%This article: 3.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.6%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 3.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Slippery Slope3.4%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 6.7%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Hasty Generalization14.5%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 8.9%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion7.0%This article: 1.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question1.1%This article: 7.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.1%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.4%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Burden of Proof1.4%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.2%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal8.2%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.4%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.9%newrepublic.com: 2.3%Unattributed Quote1.5%This article: 2.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 28.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 16.7%newrepublic.com: 15.5%Biased Writer Voice28.8%This article: 5.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination5.4%This article: 6.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 10.3%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1334 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers28%attributed speech962writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 33 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 9 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 9 words • 100.0% coverageTheodore Roosevelt Presidential Library Foundation • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph LaPlante • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph LaPlante • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageMyoung Joun • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMyoung Joun • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageAmir Ali • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageNicholas Kent • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRoberta Kaplan • 33 words • 0.0% coverageRoberta Kaplan • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRoberta Kaplan • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRoberta Kaplan • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRoberta Kaplan • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Nicholas Kent

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words12% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-39.9 ptsWriter: 39.9%Nicholas Kent: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-9.1 ptsWriter: 9.1%Nicholas Kent: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-7.5 ptsWriter: 7.5%Nicholas Kent: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%Nicholas Kent: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Nicholas Kent: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.