Speaker summary
⁠65%5 analyzed articles/videos138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Newsom's office results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50.7% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 198 faulty-reasoning hits from 138 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 35.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,924 of 28,364 speakers). This Newsom's office is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Newsom's office
Speaker details
Total words: 138
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
35.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos138 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.7%50.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.7%50.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.0%21.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.7%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos